Strategic Planning
Audrey Kinsella
Public
health organizations operate in a dynamic environment that is turbulent and
unpredictable. It is necessary for these organizations to be able to develop
and implement plans to take advantage of their changing environment. Strategic planning is a management technique
commonly used in the private sector and has many benefits that can be applied
to the healthcare and public health arenas.
Strategic managers have been able to develop successful business plans
by taking a proactive approach to the process.
The ideal organization is able to take advantage of opportunities, which
offer a clear purpose, adequate resources, enthusiasm, and commitment 1. Health care professionals are beginning
to formally study the strategic planning concepts and approaches that have led
to success in the business sector.
The
basic concept in strategic planning is to determine a plan for the organization
to undertake in the coming period, based on a vision for the future. An
organization prepares a strategic plan, which involves goals for several years
in the future. Often, a plan is for 5
years, but it can be for as few as 3 or as many as 20 2.
Strategy can be defined as
“the plans and activities developed by an organization in pursuit of its goals
and objectives, particularly in regard to positioning itself to meet external
environmental demands relative to its competition”3.
By offering a roadmap for an organization, strategic planning provides a
framework to coordinate efforts and support.
Other benefits include improved decision-making and communication, as
well as encouraging participation by all members and increasing motivation4. Strategy involves decisions of what
should be done by a wide range of individuals in health services organizations
and facilities. Planning as a management process leads to the establishment of
objectives and helps to give the organization a direction that can exist in the
external environment. It is then
possible to determine the methods to achieve these objectives.
LEVELS OF
STRATEGY
In
business, strategy is often addressed as involving several levels5,3. Each level has unique planning
responsibilities and goals. The types
of decisions being made and how they affect the organization determine the levels.
The levels of strategy include (1) corporate strategy, (2) business strategy,
and (3) functional strategy. Corporate
level strategy focuses on decisions of what type of business the organization
should be in and how it should allocate resources. This may include decisions about new services or
diversification. For example, whether
or not a hospital should get involved in long-term care or home health
care. Business level strategy focuses
on decisions about how each of these businesses will compete in the market as a
provider of a specific service or product.
Functional level strategy determines how an organization will
operationalize the corporate and business strategies. The effective implementation of any strategy may involve new
systems, hiring, training, and the establishment of new relationships. The structure of the organization may no
longer be appropriate to implement certain plans.
The
most common approaches to strategic planning involve both a strategy
formulation process and an implementation process. Formulation of the strategy is deciding what to do and
implementation is how to do it. These
processes are closely linked but can be examined separately. This chapter will focus primarily on
strategy formulation.
STRATEGY
FORMULATION
Strategy
formulation is an adaptive process used to assess or reassess an organization’s
mission and vision, and to develop plans to achieve the organization’s goals
and objectives while preserving its mission and purpose5,3. The major variables involved in the strategy
formulation process are (1) consensus of mission and vision, (2) environmental
assessment (the identification of external opportunity and risk, and internal
capabilities and advantages), and (3) setting goals and objectives.
Mission/Vision
A strategic plan should support the
organization’s vision or purpose6. A clear mission is important to offer a
guiding principle on which to base individual and departmental objectives. The organization’s mission should address
questions such as:
What is the organization’s purpose? Why is this
important? What will the organization
do to fulfill this purpose? How will the organization benefit the community? 1.
The mission statement should be specific, but should still allow for a
diversity of programs or services to be utilized in accomplishing the vision
for the future. For health services organizations, the institution must have a
basic philosophy that addresses what are the health needs of the community and
which will this organization best meet. Only when these questions are
sufficiently answered will it be possible to set objectives and methods by
which to implement them. The
organization’s mission and vision can then be translated into specific performance
goals5. It is important that the mission is
clear and in agreement by all employees, donors, managers and those utilizing
the services.
Environmental assessment
Strategy formulation is
undertaken by individuals for an organization existing in a relationship to a
dynamic external environment and an evolving internal environment7 .
To make critical strategic decisions, it is essential to gain an
understanding of the environment in which the organization operates 8.
By focusing on environmental
factors using macroenvironmental analysis or trends assessment, it is possible
to understand, anticipate, and respond to external and internal changes as a
part of the strategic planning process.
The amount of analysis necessary is determined by how much the organization
interacts with the external environment.
Public health and health care organizations are extremely susceptible to
environmental influences9. Analysis of external opportunities and
threats is of primary importance in planning for the future of these
organizations.
A macroenvironmental
analysis is the first step in the strategy formulation process. The focus of the analysis may involve an
assessment of a number of areas of the environment including the political,
economic, legal, social, and technological.
All of these areas could be important in planning strategies for health
care organizations. Information should
be gathered through a wide variety of sources.
Internal sources could include interviews and surveys of employees,
administrators, physicians or from reports generated at meetings. External sources of data may include
information from patients, suppliers, consultants, newspapers, academic
publications, and conferences.
The approach to
accomplishing an in-depth analysis of the macroenvironment involves a number of
steps9:
1. Scanning
macroenvironments for warning signs and possible environmental changes that
will affect the organization.
2. Monitoring environments
for specific trends and patterns.
3. Forecasting future
directions of environmental change.
4. Assessing current and
future trends in terms of the affects such changes would have on the
organization.
Analysis of trends is
especially important in long-range strategic planning, when the objectives will
be focused on a point far in the future and not based on current situations 10.
Utilizing the information gained in the macroenvironmental analysis can
be helpful in strategy formulation for an uncertain future. Tools such as scenario planning can be used
to evaluate proposed strategies for different potential futures. Scenario
planning involves developing specific strategic alternatives to address
different environments which may exist in the future to serve as a foundation
for the formal strategic plan11. Through using exercises such as scenario
planning, the individuals forming a strategic plan are forced to look not only
at the organization in its historical and traditional roles, but also at the
role it will have in a changing environment.
The internal environmental
assessment should involve an evaluation of the resources available or needed to
perform the operations of the organization, the performance of the organization
in accomplishing its services, and the process used to provide resources and
services1.
After information about the
environment has been assessed, target opportunities can be identified for the
strategic plan. The opportunities
should be prioritized by how consistent they are with the mission
statement.
Setting Goals and Objectives
Once the strategic
opportunities have been identified and potential threats taken into account, a
list of specific steps that will be taken to implement the plan should be
formed. Measurable outcomes are
described as specific to each objective and must be determined by the mission
statement. Responsibilities for
implementing the goals and objectives should be established. The strategic plan organized through goals
and objectives offers a set of measurable outcomes which can be evaluated. Individuals within the organization with
clear goals based on the objectives are able to focus on specific
accomplishments.
IMPLEMENTATION
Strategic
planning requires time and resources that are precious to the organizations
involved in this management technique.
Successful implementation of these strategies is a crucial part of the
planning process. Strategy
implementation involves variables such as organizational structure, division of
labor, resource allocation, leadership, control systems, information systems,
motivation and incentives, standards and measurement5.
Each of these can play an important role in the design’s ability to
achieve results.
In
addition to the above variables, a number of characteristics of the strategy
itself can influence the implementation process. These include complexity, divisibility, reversibility, diversity
or consistency, and degree of agreement 3. Complexity refers to the number of different
parts to the strategy and the difficulty in achieving them. Divisibility refers
to the amount a strategic plan can be broken down into subcomponents making it
simpler to implement. Reversibility
implies the degree to which the strategic plan can be modified or discontinued
if it becomes necessary. Diversity or consistency refers to how consistent the
plan is with the current or previous strategic orientation. The more the new strategic plan diverges
from the previous structure or strategy, the more difficult it will be to
implement. The degree of agreement refers
to the acceptance of the strategic plan by key organizational stakeholders. The more support from these key individuals,
the more likely the plan will succeed.
PERFORMANCE
The final step in the strategic planning
process is evaluating the performance and effectiveness of the plan towards
achieving its objectives. By evaluating
the progress of the plan, it is possible to determine whether or not changes
need to be made to the overall strategy.
The plan should be primarily assessed as to whether or not it has
achieved its objectives. An assessment may also be made according to 3 basic
types of performance indicators: financial, operational, and other strategic
indicators5. Financial indicators are broad-based values
based on standards or competitive comparisons.
Operational indicators rate the efficiency and effectiveness of the
organization. This may reflect
competitive advantage or position.
Other indicators may include public opinion or other more abstract
measures.
Strategic
planning can offer health care and public health professionals the opportunity
to form a much clearer vision of what they are trying to accomplish. The volatile environment in which these
organizations must adapt and evolve is the ideal situation for this management
process to be utilized. Management in
the health fields offers similar challenges to other areas including the
accomplishment of the mission, designing goals and objectives, allocation of
resources, and performance evaluation.
Successful applications of strategic planning in the business sector
offer some valuable techniques for health care.
References:
1. Burkhart,
P.J. & Reuss, S. Successful Strategic
Planning, Sage
Publications, 1993.
2. Anthony,
R.N., & Young, D.W. Management Control in
Nonprofit Organizations. Irwin-McGraw Hill, 1999.
3. Kovner,
A.R., &Neuhauser, D. Health Services Management. Health Administration Press,
1990.
5. Beamish,
P. Asia-Pacific Cases in Strategic Management. Irwin-McGraw Hill, 2000.
7.
Longest, Jr. B.B. Management Practices for the
Health Professional. Reston, 1984.
9.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Strategic Planning for Public
Health Practice Using Macroenvironmental Analysis, Public Health Reports 1991,
106:134-141, March/April 1991.
11.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; The Use of Scenario Analysis in Local
Public Health Departments: Alternative Futures for Strategic Planning, Public
Health Reports 1993, 108:701-710, December 1993.