
University
of Nebraska Press
Shofar
- Books Received
Shofar
- Advertising &
Mailing List Info
Shofar
- Book Reviews |
Biblical Interpretation in Judaism and Christianity, edited by Isaac Kalimi and Peter J. Haas. New York and London: T&T Clark, 2006. 265 pp. $156.00.
One of the more exciting developments in recent decades in the field of biblical studies has been the turn away from a fixation on the prehistory of the sacred text to the study of its reception. This new interest in the history of scriptural interpretation is promising for a number of reasons. It has the potential of overcoming the (often artificial) divide between the scholarly community and the communities of faith, and it rallies together scholars from a variety of backgrounds and academic disciplines—secular and faithful, Jewish and Christian, of the modern and the pre–modern periods—around a common topic. The present volume, which brings together some of the leading scholars in their respective fields, is a most welcome addition to the rapidly growing number of publications on the history of biblical exegesis, as it reaches these objectives formidably.
The book comprises sixteen articles. Of these most (we are not told which) were originally presented at a conference at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, in May 2004, organized in honor of the publication of Isaac Kalimi’s book Early Jewish Exegesis and Theological Controversy (Assen, 2002).
Following an introductory essay by Isaac Kalimi, the articles are organized in three parts. Part one, with seven essays the longest section in the book, deals with classical and medieval Jewish biblical interpretation. Part two, consisting of three articles, deals with the intersection of Judaism and Christianity in biblical interpretation. And part three, with six articles, turns to modern Jewish biblical studies.
The three sections of the book differ markedly from one another. The focus of a conference volume of this sort will necessarily be on case studies, the study of individual texts and their interpretations, rather than on broader, systematic overviews. This is particularly true for the first group of articles, with articles on the pre–modern Jewish history of reading of Gen 4:8, and of Gen 35:22, and an essay on the shape of the Menorah. Two articles in particular are interesting. In Isaac Kalimi’s article “Targumic and Midrashic Exegesis in Contradiction to the Peshat of Biblical Text,” the reader is treated to a wealth of cases in which the Rabbis deliberately part from the plain meaning of the biblical text in order to arrive at a certain interpretation. The other article that stands out, both for the breadth of the (otherwise little known) materials the author adduces from diverse Jewish Psalms commentaries and for its insightful conclusions, is Alan Cooper’s “On the Typology of Jewish Psalms Interpretation.” Cooper argues that there are three different types of Davidic personae in these intriguing commentaries: the king of yore, the longed-for Messiah, and the Everyman of the present.
The second group of essays, on biblical interpretation in Judaism and Christianity, is the weakest part of the book, not because, despite the book’s title, Christian interpretation plays only a very minor role, but because the enormous complexities of the primary Christian texts here discussed from the New Testament are not sufficiently acknowledged or reflected in the notes. Larry Schiffman’s article on biblical exegesis in the passion narratives and the Dead Sea Scrolls, and Harold Ellens’s contribution on the Son of Man in the Gospel of John and other Jewish texts go over much familiar territory but break relatively little new ground. John Townsend in his article on Christianity in Rabbinic literature offers the interesting argument that unambiguous references to Jesus and Christianity in Jewish literature seem to have emerged outside the Christian Roman Empire and before that empire became Christian, whereas later references to Christian theology and scriptural interpretation in the midrashim are considerably more covert.
The third section of the book, finally, on modern Jewish biblical studies, is the most rewarding to read. Especially fascinating are the first two essays. The opening article is by Alan Levenson, “The Rise of Modern Jewish Bible Studies: Preliminary Reflections.” Levenson argues that when we speak of “Jewish readings of the Bible,” we are talking about the construction of certain tendencies in biblical discourse that are generally recognized as Jewish (pp. 166–67). He mentions four facets of this “Jewish” approach: its polemical, pro–Jewish nature; its frequent recourse to rabbinic traditions; its celebration of the multiple meanings contained in a particular biblical text; and the priority it gives to “R,” the biblical redactor(s). The second article by Frederick Greenspahn is titled, “Why Jews Translate the Bible.” Greenspahn begins by making the obvious point that in Judaism, it is the Hebrew form of the Bible that is to be preserved, studied, and used for worship. But then Greenspahn continues to note that, throughout its history, the Jewish tradition has not only tolerated translations, “but on occasion accorded them a degree of authority approaching that of the Hebrew” (p. 181). He lists several intriguing examples, spanning two millennia, and concludes, in a nice twist, with a brief midrash from Pesikta Rabbati that asserts “Jewishness” not through ownership of the Bible, but through the uniqueness of the Mishnah (p. 195).
The colorful bouquet of specific Jewish readings, together with the hermeneutical reflections on the Jewishness of Jewish readings of the Bible, collected in this volume make it a delightful read.
Matthias Henze
Rice University
|